The Iran conflict matters more for inflation than growth

"For the last half-decade, the U.S. has been a net exporter of oil, reflecting the fracking boom of the 2010s. That doesn't mean that the U.S. imports no oil, nor that domestic consumers won't pay a price for higher oil - it is a global market. It does mean that in terms of economic aggregates, the pinch at the pump due to geopolitics would be expected to be more than offset by higher incomes for U.S. drillers, their shareholders, suppliers and employees."

"In effect, higher oil prices in this era wouldn't be expected to cause a broad slowdown or recession, but to shift economic activity among different sectors and regions. It's good news for oil-producing regions like Texas, Oklahoma and the Dakotas, and bad news for the Northeast and West Coast."

"It is a contrast with past moments of Middle East crisis, which caused surging energy prices that did serious damage to the U.S. economy, creating serious stagflationary shocks. That happened with the Yom Kippur War in 1973 and accompanying oil embargo, as well as the 1978 Iranian revolution and the Iran-Iraq war that began in 1980."

The United States' transition to a net oil exporter over the past five years fundamentally changes how geopolitical crises affect the economy. While higher oil prices still impact consumers globally, the economic benefits to U.S. drillers, shareholders, and energy-producing regions like Texas and Oklahoma offset broader economic damage. Energy now represents a smaller share of personal consumption than historically. This contrasts sharply with past Middle East crises—the 1973 Yom Kippur War, 1978 Iranian Revolution, and 1990 Kuwait invasion—which triggered severe stagflationary shocks and recessions. Current market reactions show modest impacts, with oil up 6% and stocks barely declining, suggesting limited recession risk despite ongoing geopolitical tensions.

Read at Axios