"This text reads as nothing more than a globalist wish list of divisive cultural causes including climate, sexual and reproductive health, gender, and the perverse donor-recipient industrial complex. It is completely at odds with the Trump Administration's bold and pragmatic foreign policy,"
"another example in a growing list of performative resolutions that detract from the United Nations' core mandate of maintaining international peace and security."
"highly controversial meanings conflating this term with notions of abortion, LGBTQ and other sexual rights."
"wildly off-track exaggerating climate change into the world's greatest threat."
The United States opposed two consecutive United Nations resolutions on humanitarian worker protection and disaster aid, preventing the usual consensus and standing alone among member states. The United States characterized the proposed language as a globalist list of divisive cultural causes and objected to references to climate, gender, and sexual and reproductive healthcare. The United States described the resolutions as performative and inconsistent with its foreign policy and argued that some phrasing conflated reproductive healthcare with abortion and LGBTQ rights. Both resolutions had been expected to pass by consensus before U.S. objections forced formal votes.
Read at LGBTQ Nation
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]