Reddit is arguing it's a 'collection of public fora' and not a social media company. Here's why.
Briefly

Reddit is arguing it's a 'collection of public fora' and not a social media company. Here's why.
A new Australian law prohibits people under 16 from opening or maintaining social media accounts and requires platforms to deactivate those accounts. Reddit filed a lawsuit seeking revocation or exemption of the law. Reddit argues the law infringes the implied freedom of political communication. Reddit contends it is not a social media platform but a collection of public fora arranged by subject. Reddit asserts its purpose is not to enable online social interaction between end-users, that users often do not know each other's real identities, and that it does not import contact lists. Reddit highlights the upvote/downvote feature as an indicator of content usefulness rather than social connection.
"As part of the legal filing, Reddit also pushed back at being labeled an "age-restricted social media platform" within the meaning of Australia's law. Instead, Reddit said it "operates as a collection of public fora arranged by subject." "That is because it is not the case that the sole purpose, or a significant purpose, of Reddit is to enable 'online social interaction' between two or more end-users," the company said in its 12-page legal filing."
"The company added that, in most cases, users don't know each other's real identities. "Reddit does not import contact lists or address books. The 'upvote/downvote' functionality enables users to indicate how helpful they found the information that was posted by an end-user," the company said in the lawsuit. "It is not intended to be used as a way for users to express any view about the poster themselves. In this way, Reddit is significantly different from other sites that allow for users to become 'friends"
Read at Business Insider
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]