"Have we all reached saturation point by now? Have we devoured enough of the tale about a dish wonderfully described in The Mushroom Tapes as the flamboyantly retro beef wellington? The elusive food dehydrator? The fake cancer? The fake cat? Here we are, still turning the page, still clicking the headlines, still asking: what was she thinking? Speaking to Guardian Australia, Garner, Hooper and Krasnostein continue to dissect and digest the case."
"There's still daylight between the puzzle pieces. At first, we were seriously considering that this might have been a great injustice not in terms of total innocence, but we were open that maybe it wasn't quite what it looked like, and maybe there was some explanation for this behaviour, she says. And then I think, as the trial progressed, it became more and more clear that this was perhaps far less complex than we had imagined."
Three narrators confront a persistent ethical ambivalence while covering the Erin Patterson case. The ambivalence began early and lingered, even as global media treated the ten-week trial as sensational. Public fascination centered on minor theatrical details: a flamboyantly retro beef wellington, an elusive food dehydrator, fake cancer and a fake cat. Investigative perspectives shifted from potential miscarriage of justice to recognition that motives were simpler and differently complex than expected. Observers described unresolved gaps between puzzle pieces and acknowledged evolving interpretations as evidence unfolded. The case prompted comparisons to the banality of evil, highlighting how petty lies, poor choices and mundanity produced devastating consequences.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]