BBC apologises to Trump over Panorama edit but refuses to pay compensation
Briefly

BBC apologises to Trump over Panorama edit but refuses to pay compensation
"The BBC has apologised to US President Donald Trump for a Panorama episode that spliced parts of his 6 January 2021 speech together, but rejected his demands for compensation. The corporation said the edit had given "the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action" and said it would not show the 2024 programme again. Lawyers for Trump have threatened to sue the BBC for $1bn (759m) in damages unless the corporation issues a retraction, apologises and compensates him."
"Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy told BBC Breakfast she was confident the corporation was "gripping this with the seriousness that it demands", adding her role was to ensure "the highest standards are upheld". But she also told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that the BBC's editorial standards and guidelines were "in some cases not robust enough and in other cases not consistently applied", adding that there would need to be people "at a very senior level with a journalistic background"."
"Liberal Democrats leader Sir Ed Davey had urged the prime minister on Thursday to "get on the phone to Trump" to put a stop to his lawsuit threat and "defend the impartiality and independence of the BBC". The fallout from the scandal led to the resignations of BBC director general Tim Davie and head of news Deborah Turness on Sunday. BBC News has approached the White House for comment."
The BBC apologised to US President Donald Trump for an edited Panorama episode that spliced parts of his 6 January 2021 speech and gave the mistaken impression he called for violent action. The corporation rejected Trump's demand for compensation and said it would not re-air the 2024 programme. Lawyers for Trump threatened a $1bn lawsuit unless the BBC issued a retraction, apology and compensation. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said BBC standards were not always robust or consistently applied and called for senior-level journalistic oversight. The controversy prompted high-level resignations and renewed scrutiny of political appointments to the BBC board.
Read at www.bbc.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]