"Today's browsers can handle most of the problems that frontend frameworks were originally created to solve. Web Components provide encapsulation, ES modules manage dependencies, modern CSS features like Grid and container queries enable complex layouts, and the Fetch API covers network requests. Despite this, developers still default to React, Angular, Vue, or another JavaScript framework to address problems the browser already handles natively. That default often trades real user costs -page weight, performance, and SEO - for developer convenience."
""Frameworkism" and "anti-frameworkism" aren't formal terms or established movements. They're shorthand for two competing defaults in how developers approach new projects. At its core, the divide is about where you choose to start. Frameworkism follows a framework-first mindset. A framework - most often React - is selected upfront and treated as the baseline. This approach assumes fast devices and reliable networks, starts heavy by default, and relies on optimization later if performance issues show up."
Modern browsers handle many problems that frontend frameworks originally solved. Web Components provide encapsulation, ES modules manage dependencies, modern CSS features like Grid and container queries enable complex layouts, and the Fetch API covers network requests. Despite native capabilities, developers often choose frameworks such as React, Angular, or Vue by default, increasing page weight and harming performance and SEO for developer convenience. A framework-first mindset assumes fast devices and reliable networks and starts heavy, while an anti-framework approach starts with zero dependencies, uses native browser features, and adds frameworks only when real limitations appear.
Read at LogRocket Blog
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]