Do the Nationals need to trade CJ Abrams this offseason?

"The Nationals need to address their pitching problem first and foremost. I would do that not by trading 2024 All-Star CJ Abrams but by trading MacKenzie Gore. The Nationals have a decently strong farm system, with highly touted pitchers that can bolster the team in the coming years, but they need help now--and for that, Gore is the way to go."

"CJ Abrams is needed on the Nationals roster because the infield is lackluster. The team needs a leader in the infield who has quick movement, not just for fielding, but for base running, too. He stole 31 bags each of the last two seasons, and while his on-base percentage is about league average, I believe that if trained properly, and with practice, he can get walked more, get more singles, steal more bases, leading to more runs."

"So in short, I don't believe the Nationals should trade CJ Abrams--he is a fan favorite and has the potential to be greater than ever. However, it would not shock me if the Nationals did trade CJ, as the team has been known for trading its star players away to avoid paying them. If the Nationals want the best chance at inching closer to the top of the NL East, it is in their best interest to keep Abrams around."

The Nationals have multiple weaknesses but CJ Abrams has provided a bright spot with speed, defense, and consistent health. Abrams stole 31 bases in each of the last two seasons and profiles as a top-of-the-order catalyst who can produce runs through walks, singles, and steals. The organization needs immediate pitching help; trading MacKenzie Gore rather than Abrams is recommended to acquire proven arms now. The farm system contains highly touted pitchers who can bolster the club in coming years, but short-term upgrades are required. Top prospect Eli Willits (shortstop) will not be MLB-ready until 2029, reinforcing the case to retain Abrams.

Read at District on Deck