"At root, Donner alleges he was targeted because he objected to Fox News' fallacious reporting and its editorial decision to align the network with President Trump and the MAGA faction of the Republican Party."
"The Court does not doubt that, apart from trying to uphold basic standards of journalistic integrity, Donner's objections to Fox's reporting had a political valence. But that is not enough to state a valid claim because the DCHRA protects political affiliations, not political positions or perspectives."
"The facts developed in discovery show a different picture one in which Donner did not call his supervisor to report he was sick prior to the start of his workday, but rather slept in, knowing he was sick and telling a coworker, but not his supervisor."
A judge in Washington, D.C. dismissed Jason Donner's lawsuit against Fox News, where he claimed he was fired for refusing to report false information about the 2020 election and the January 6 Capitol Riot. The court found that Donner's objections to the network's reporting were politically motivated but did not constitute a valid claim under the D.C. Human Rights Act. Additionally, the judge dismissed claims of retaliation for taking a sick day, citing evidence that Donner did not properly notify his supervisor of his illness.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]