What You Should Be Playing This Weekend Of 9/12/25
Briefly

What You Should Be Playing This Weekend Of 9/12/25
"As you might expect, we here at Game Informer love playing video games, and we love writing about them because it's our best way of speaking directly to you - our audience. We enjoy sharing the games we're loving, the ones we're not, what titles fascinate us, what we're looking forward to, and occasionally, what we had for lunch (carne asada is back at Chipotle, so I indulged in a burrito there today)."
"We're still experimenting with bringing something like that back to the site, but we want to go deeper. We don't want to just talk ad nauseam about the games we're playing (which often include embargoed stuff where we have to annoyingly/cheekily call it REDACTED), but instead, use this space to highlight interesting things happening in games you might have missed,"
"In this edition, you'll find words from Game Informer editors about why now might be a great time to jump back into Marvel Rivals if you haven't in a minute, the strange (and normal) ways we play Hollow Knight: Silksong, what it's like watching someone else play The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom, and yes, a quick tease about an upcoming first-party PlayStation 5 game we can't talk too much about yet."
Game Informer experienced a busy week of video game coverage that included a Borderlands 4 review, developer interviews, extensive playtime with Hollow Knight: Silksong, and coverage of the latest Nintendo Direct. The staff values playing games and writing as a way to connect with their audience and shares favorites, disappointments, upcoming interests, and personal asides like a carne asada burrito. The site is exploring a return to a Weekend Warrior-style feature while shifting toward deeper content that highlights overlooked developments, fresh perspectives on classics, and reminders of upcoming titles. Coverage includes editor thoughts on Marvel Rivals, watching Tears of the Kingdom, and a PlayStation 5 tease.
Read at Game Informer
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]