"For Jorjani, opinions on the controversial topic are too black and white. "Maybe, could it be, that reality is somewhere in the middle? Could it be?" he asked. He believes that, rather than developers using AI to "remove the stuff we don't want to do," people jump to "let's never actually use AI, all AI is bad AI." "We don't put any AI in the games," Jorjani says. "But if it can allow me to do my receipts faster, that's more Helldivers for everyone.""
"This sparked a heated debate about the use of AI in game development and even negatively (which awarded it two out of five stars). "I find that people jump to extreme takes," Jorjani says of the response to Arc Raiders' AI use. "I think it's a very interesting use case that actually makes gaming better." But as Dring brings up during the interview, Square Enix recently revealed it wants to eventually have 70 percent of its quality assurance work done by AI."
Opinions on AI in game development are often polarized between outright rejection and pragmatic adoption. Some developers use AI to expand recorded voice lines instead of re-recording every new line, reducing repetitive work. AI can speed administrative tasks and production workflows, potentially allowing more content and faster releases. Examples include Embark using AI to flesh out in-game voice lines and Square Enix targeting significant AI use in quality assurance. The debate centers on job impacts, creative integrity, and extremes of response, while measured AI application is argued to make gaming better and more efficient.
Read at Kotaku
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]