XLK vs. VGT vs. FTXL: Which Tech ETF Belongs in Your Portfolio?

"XLK carries a net expense ratio of 0.08% against VGT's 0.09% - a difference so small it is effectively irrelevant over any time horizon. FTXL is the outlier here: its expense ratio is listed at 0.006%, though this figure warrants independent verification given it appears unusually low for a specialized semiconductor fund."

"Over the past year, FTXL returned 98.23%, nearly doubling. XLK returned 35.6% over the same period, and VGT returned 34.65%. Year-to-date in 2026, the gap is even more striking: FTXL is up 17.35%, while XLK is down 2.46% and VGT is down 2.49%."

"The driver is FTXL's pure semiconductor mandate. Micron Technology and Intel alone represent 28.04% of the fund, and the entire portfolio is built around chipmakers and semiconductor equipment companies. When the semiconductor cycle accelerates - as it has with AI infrastructure buildout - FTXL captures that upside with intensity that broad tech ETFs cannot match."

XLK and VGT are nearly identical in cost, with expense ratios of 0.08% and 0.09% respectively, making them exceptional values. XLK holds 75 positions across $87.7 billion in assets, while VGT holds over 400 positions with $126.5 billion. FTXL, a specialized semiconductor fund with $1.6 billion in assets, claims a 0.006% expense ratio but introduces significant concentration risk. Over the past year, FTXL returned 98.23% compared to XLK's 35.6% and VGT's 34.65%, driven by its pure semiconductor mandate where Micron and Intel represent 28.04% of holdings. Over five years, FTXL returned 149.88% versus XLK's 122.21% and VGT's 113.08%. The choice depends on investor priorities: broad diversification and stability versus concentrated growth exposure.

Read at 24/7 Wall St.