"Immediately after Grokipedia went live, the AI-powered Wikipedia alternative was tested by numerous users. So far, a good number of testers have responded positively to the online encyclopedia, with many observing that Grokipedia does tend to be more neutral than Wikipedia. This was particularly evident in controversial topics, from alternative medicine to events like Gamergate. Among these users was Larry Sanger, who noted that while Grokipedia still has a lot of areas of improvement, it is already very promising."
"My initial impression, looking at my own article and poking around here and there, is that Grokipedia is very OK. The jury's still out as to whether it's actually better than Wikipedia. But at this point I would have to say "maybe"! https://t.co/ZWp6S504XC- Larry Sanger (@lsanger) October 28, 2025 Musk responded to Sanger's comments, stating that the Wikipedia co-founder's observations are "accurate." The xAI founder also noted in a separate X post that even in its V0.1 form, Grokipedia is already better than Wikipedia."
Grokipedia launched as an AI-powered alternative to Wikipedia and is currently at Version 0.1. Numerous early testers reported positive impressions and noted Grokipedia tends to be more neutral than Wikipedia, especially on controversial topics such as alternative medicine and Gamergate. Larry Sanger examined his own entry, called Grokipedia "very OK," and called its prospects "maybe" better than Wikipedia while noting areas needing improvement. Musk described Sanger's observations as "accurate" and stated that even in V0.1 form Grokipedia is already better than Wikipedia. Sanger said Wikipedia has drifted from his initial vision.
Read at TESLARATI
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]