
"On December 1, podcaster and venture capitalist Harry Stebbings posted on LinkedIn that candidates were 200 times more likely to get into Harvard University than they were to get a job at the $6.6 billion valuation AI startup ElevenLabs. According to his statistic, out of 180,000 applicants in the first half of the year, only 0.018% were hired by the AI voice agent platform."
"And out of tens of thousands of applications, just 132 candidates eventually got the job at ElevenLabs-indeed, much lower than Harvard's 3% to 4% admission rates. "On average, we're seeing more people apply every quarter," says Victoria Weller, VP of operations at ElevenLabs. "I hope that the high number of applicants motivates people-it's inspiring to work somewhere that's hard to get in. It's like Harvard: once you're in, you know you're surrounded by the best people in an inspiring environment.""
A claim compared candidate odds of admission to Harvard University with hiring odds at the $6.6 billion AI startup ElevenLabs, asserting a 200‑to‑1 disparity. The claim cited roughly 180,000 applicants in the first half of the year and a 0.018% hiring rate for the AI voice agent platform. That figure was extrapolated from a July spike in applications and may have been hyperbolic, yet it went viral. Ultimately, 132 candidates were hired from tens of thousands of applications, a selectivity markedly below Harvard's 3%–4% admissions. ElevenLabs reports rising applicant volume each quarter and frames selectivity as motivating and inspiring.
Read at Fast Company
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]