"In the board game My First Journey: Discover China, the extensive use of green and red immediately struck me as a potential disaster for children with red-green color blindness. The core mechanic of the game relies on matching travel tickets to accessible routes based on color. This system would render paths indistinguishable as "a gray path" for colorblind players. This issue is not unique to board games; it reflects a broader oversight in many digital product designs, where accessibility is frequently neglected."
"To enhance gameplay engagement, some board games intentionally incorporate controllable mistakes into their design. These features act like built-in "airbags" - preserving space for adventure within an error-proof framework, allowing children to experience the thrill of risk-aware decision-making within safe boundaries. In Rouleboule L'escargot, players often inevitably bump into each other's counters, but this typically leads to shared laughter rather than post-mistake embarrassment. Similarly, in Tiny Acrobats, the collapse of poorly balanced blocks doesn't frustrate children - instead, it motivates them to try again eagerly."
My First Journey: Discover China uses green and red extensively, making route-matching mechanics unreadable to players with red-green color blindness and turning paths into indistinguishable 'a gray path'. Accessibility omissions like color-dependent mechanics are common across digital and physical product design. Some board games deliberately include controllable mistakes to increase engagement, acting as built-in 'airbags' that allow risk-aware decision-making within safe boundaries. Examples include Rouleboule L'escargot, where bumped counters produce shared laughter, and Tiny Acrobats, where collapsing blocks encourage repeated attempts. Such controlled chaos fosters engineering intuition and a willingness to take risks, transforming failure into motivation for mastery.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]