"I'd like to start with a small confession: for a long time, I treated questionnaires the way most designers treat accessibility guidelines. I knew they existed, and I respected them in principle. But I quietly avoided them whenever I could. Because of my feeling that I was already perfectly prepared for the work, and that extra steps when the product already looks ready can create unnecessary chaos and tension."
"They are conceptual tools that allow us to explain why "this layout should feel lighter," or "this flow should reduce cognitive load." But in reality, the only approach truly capable of telling us whether our hypothesis was right is the user in front of a real interface, leaving us feedback. That's where questionnaires come in."
Designers often treat questionnaires like accessibility guidelines: known and respected in principle but frequently avoided. Confidence in preparation and fear that extra steps will create chaos lead to skipping quantitative measures. Visual principles such as Gestalt, mental models, and color theory serve as conceptual tools for grouping, anticipation, and emotional guidance. Those tools explain layout weight and reduce cognitive load in flows. Only real user interaction with an interface can confirm whether design hypotheses are correct. Questionnaires capture quantitative feedback from users to validate designs. Engineering practices can offer useful lessons for rigorous, quantitative user research.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]