"After reviewing many UX portfolios, a consistent pattern emerges: the strongest examples rely less on decoration and more on reasoning. Beautiful screens play a role, yet hiring managers usually search for something deeper: how you think, how you decide, how you collaborate, and how your work changes outcomes. A second truth shapes this space as well: attention remains extremely short."
"In many screenings, someone spends 30 seconds to 4 minutes on your site. Inside that narrow window, the person needs a clear sense of who you are, what you do well, and where your most relevant work lives. Your portfolio succeeds or fails inside that first scan. Every piece of the narrative supports one aim: to present a clear argument that you deliver value."
Strong UX portfolios emphasize reasoning over decoration. Beautiful screens help, but hiring managers focus on thinking, decision-making, collaboration, and impact. Attention is short; reviewers often spend 30 seconds to 4 minutes scanning portfolios. During that window, portfolios must clearly show who the designer is, their strengths, and where relevant work resides. Each narrative element should present a clear argument that the designer delivers value. Case studies should function as structured arguments answering which problem was addressed, why it mattered, which paths were explored, and which were discarded with reasoning.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]