""What am I supposed to do if my company pivots like 4 times a year?" a Lead Designer asked me recently. It's a question that captures the current reality of design work. While the job market remains challenging, designers who are still employed face a different pressure: businesses are demanding faster output with smaller teams. Many designers find themselves forced into startup environments, not by choice. 0A combination of AI tools and layoffs has reduced mid-size companies to skeleton crews that must operate at startup speed."
"You're being asked to work faster and more efficiently...but leadership's vision keeps shifting. You're revisiting old design ideas from 2023 one quarter, then chasing completely new features the next. Different stakeholders demand different priorities, and you're uncertain how to manage the constant pivoting. Traditional UX processes struggle in these conditions. By the time you've created comprehensive user personas, detailed customer journeys, or elaborate design systems, they're already outdated."
Designers who remain employed face pressure to produce faster outputs with smaller teams amid frequent company pivots. Mid-size companies are often reduced to skeleton crews by AI adoption and layoffs, forcing designers into startup-speed environments not by choice. Leadership priorities shift regularly, causing designers to revisit recent work one quarter and chase new features the next. Conflicting stakeholder demands create uncertainty and make constant pivoting difficult to manage. Traditional UX processes like detailed personas, customer journeys, and expansive design systems become outdated by the time they are completed, reducing their practical value.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]