"When I transitioned from a UI/UX designer role to a greater involvement in both product and design decisions, I realised the biggest shift was in perspective. It was learning to anchor design decisions on user and business outcomes, not just on pixel-perfect UIs. This approach forced me to think less about "is this design pretty?" and more about "does this design help someone take the next step?""
"Where are the real friction points? Which steps can we eliminate or streamline? and on and on... Don't fall into THIS trap! Outcome-driven design works well in B2C contexts, where metrics like sign-ups or purchases are more likely to clearly tie back to design choices. But when you shift into building B2B products, things become a little messier. In enterprise software, adoption isn't as simple as a single click."
Design decisions should be anchored to measurable user and business outcomes rather than aesthetics. Outcome-driven thinking shifts focus from visual polish to whether a design helps users take the next step. Designers should constantly ask what is missing, what complications users may face, where friction exists, and which steps can be eliminated or streamlined. Outcome metrics map cleanly in B2C contexts through sign-ups or purchases. Enterprise and B2B products introduce complexity because adoption often involves multiple roles and cannot be reduced to a single click. UX managers and designers must consider product, organizational, and workflow factors when measuring design success.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]