"If you're trying to learn how to write good Figma Make prompts, you've probably hit the same wall I did. Most advice stays abstract.Be clear. Add context. Explain intent. None of that helps when you're staring at an empty prompt box wondering what actually needs to go in there. What's missing in the industry right now isn't more frameworks. It's real examples. Full prompts. End-to-end inputs you can actually read and learn from."
"This post breaks down three real approaches designers are already using to write Figma Make prompts: using a PRD as the prompt translating loose inputs into Make-ready instructions pressure-testing intent with a simple checklist Instead of frameworks, this post shows full prompts end to end, including the tradeoffs, time cost, and limitations that come with them. The goal isn't better prompts for their own sake. It's fewer reruns, clearer intent, and workflows that still hold up as these tools become more constrained and more expensive."
Most Figma Make guidance remains abstract and fails to show the concrete inputs needed to produce reliable outputs. A practical prompt should include full, end-to-end inputs, explicit intent, context, constraints, and acceptance criteria. Three effective approaches are using a PRD as the prompt, translating loose or informal requirements into Make-ready instructions, and pressure-testing intent with a simple checklist. Including tradeoffs, time cost, and tool limitations helps set expectations and reduce wasted iterations. Real, tested prompts reveal the tradeoffs designers accept and the workflows that remain robust as tools become more constrained and more expensive. Applying these techniques reduces reruns and clarifies outcomes.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]