"Most advice stays abstract.Be clear. Add context. Explain intent. None of that helps when you're staring at an empty prompt box wondering what actually needs to go in there. What's missing in the industry right now isn't more frameworks. It's real examples. Full prompts. End-to-end inputs you can actually read and learn from. By the end of this post, you should have a clearer sense of what actually belongs in a Figma Make prompt, based on real inputs that already work."
"Instead of inventing yet another framework, I looked at what already exists. I studied real inputs, tested them, and compared the results. This post documents that process using real prompts, real tradeoffs, and real constraints. If you're new to Figma Make, this will help you get unstuck. If you've already used it, this will help you waste fewer prompts. TL;DR Most Figma Make advice is vague. It tells you to "add context" without showing what a good prompt actually looks like."
Most Figma Make guidance is abstract and lacks concrete, usable examples. Effective prompts supply end-to-end inputs: clear goals, concrete examples, constraints, and testable instructions. Three practical approaches include using a PRD as a prompt, translating loose inputs into Make-ready instructions, and pressure-testing intent with a simple checklist. Real prompts reveal tradeoffs, time costs, and limitations that frameworks alone hide. Focusing on full prompts and real inputs reduces wasted iterations, clarifies intent, and produces workflows that remain useful as tools become more constrained and more expensive.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]