Elie Honig highlighted the lack of evidence for alleged criminal offenses by Obama administration officials linked to the 2016 election interference. He challenged claims about potential charges, asking what specific crimes were being alleged. Honig pointed out that investigations have not revealed substantive findings. He noted that many of the alleged events date back several years, meaning they may be beyond the statute of limitations for prosecution. The conversation highlighted the ongoing political discourse and baseless allegations surrounding the issue.
HONIG: Well, so that's my question. I know I'm here to answer questions. What's the crime? I mean, what's even the potential crime? I mean, seriously, I'm not trying to be confrontational here. Can anyone at this table even articulate what the potential crime might be?
HONIG: I mean, this is ancient history, legally. The statute of limitations on almost every federal crime is five years. This stuff was back in 2016.
Collection
[
|
...
]