"AI preemption would not apply to local infrastructure. That's a separate issue," Sacks wrote. "In short, preemption would not force communities to host data centers they don't want."
"First, this is not an "AI amnesty" or "AI moratorium." It is an attempt to settle a question of jurisdiction."
"He called those concerns the four Cs - child safety, communities, creators, and censorship."
"He also said that state laws requiring platforms to protect against online predators and child sexual abuse material would remain in effect, because AI preemption wouldn't apply to 'generally applicable state laws.'"
David Sacks framed the forthcoming executive order on AI preemption as an effort to settle jurisdictional questions about where AI regulation should apply. He identified primary concerns as child safety, communities, creators, and censorship. Sacks emphasized that preemption would not cover local infrastructure and would not force communities to host data centers. He stated that state laws requiring platforms to guard against online predators and child sexual abuse material would remain effective because preemption would not displace generally applicable state laws. He characterized the policy as neither an AI amnesty nor an AI moratorium.
Read at Business Insider
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]