A United States appeals court overturned a lower court's ruling that allowed for contempt charges against Trump officials for actions during the mass deportation effort. The ruling was a victory for the Trump administration, dismissing concerns that the administration ignored judicial authority. The majority opinion, led by judges appointed by Trump, stated that the lower court had exceeded its authority in this matter. The dissenting opinion raised alarms about potential erosion of judicial power and authority over the executive branch's conduct in foreign affairs.
The appeals court's decision was hailed as a major victory by the Trump administration, which has long railed against the judicial roadblocks to its agenda.
Rao ruled that the lower court had overstepped its authority in opening the door for Trump officials to be held in contempt.
Pillard defended the lower court's decision and questioned whether the appeals court was, in fact, eroding judicial authority in favour of increased executive power.
The district court's order attempts to control the Executive Branch's conduct of foreign affairs, an area in which a court's power is at its lowest ebb.
Collection
[
|
...
]