President Trump has used executive orders and threats against major law firms employing lawyers who opposed him politically, leading some firms to withdraw from opposition and agree to substantial pro bono work for his administration. He claims this capitulation demonstrates his effectiveness and suggests that these firms admitted wrongdoing regarding election legitimacy. While some firms chose to resist, Trump's powerful rhetoric and ability to exert pressure raise questions about the appropriateness of his presidential power usage.
Trump claimed that major law firms' capitulation to his administration reflects success, as their pro bono agreements demonstrate their fear of consequences for opposing him.
Trump defended his approach to leverage executive orders and threats against law firms, asserting that their cooperation indicates they recognized wrongdoing regarding the election.
Collection
[
|
...
]