The article discusses how the Trump administration, despite claims of obstruction from the judiciary, could legally implement its agenda without resorting to chaotic and controversial measures. It points out that various policy moves such as program eliminations and workforce reductions could have been approached in a more structured manner through Congress. By doing so, the administration could have avoided litigation and constitutional crises. The author emphasizes the missed opportunities for a more orderly governance that would satisfy both policy objectives and legal frameworks.
If there is a parallel universe out there somewhere, there's a world in which much of what Team Trump wants to accomplish policy-wise could be done in a perfectly legal and orderly way.
Much of the administration's agenda could have been implemented without the endless litigation and the risk of a constitutional crisis we see nearly every day.
The Department of Government Efficiency's wild and unauthorized eliminations of federal programs could have been accomplished through a largely supine and Republican-controlled Congress.
The deportation of immigrants to third-party countries, which has created so much pain and havoc, could have been pursued in a more organized manner.
#trump-administration #legal-challenges #policy-implementation #government-efficiency #judicial-system
Collection
[
|
...
]