The Democrats Were Winning, But Trump's Cruelty Forced Their Hand
Briefly

The Democrats Were Winning, But Trump's Cruelty Forced Their Hand
"This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss why Democrats caved to end the government shutdown and what comes next, the affordability crisis with guest and editorial director for New York Times Opinion David Leonhardt, and the importance of this week's spectacle of competing Epstein document drops. Here are some notes and references from this week's show: David Morgan for Reuters: US House to vote on deal to end longest government shutdown in history"
"Annie Karni for The New York Times (News Analysis): What if Democrats' Big Shutdown Loss Turns Out to Be a Win? The Editors for National Review: Democrats Caved on the Shutdown Tim Kaine for The New York Times (Opinion - Guest Essay): Tim Kaine: Why I Voted to End the Shutdown Kristen Soltis Anderson for The New York Times (Opinion - Guest Essay): Voters Crave Action. Democrats Should Listen."
Democrats approved a funding agreement to end the longest government shutdown, incorporating measures like back pay and policy riders that prompted debate over political costs and benefits. Commentary and guest essays weighed whether concessions were strategic losses or tactical wins. Affordability rose as a central electoral issue, with analysts and commentators linking price pressures and stagnant wages to voter anxiety while political actors vied to own the affordability narrative. Simultaneously, large, competing releases of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents by both parties intensified scrutiny, fueled investigations, and produced a high-profile political spectacle over sensitive material.
Read at Slate Magazine
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]