The Clintons Testified About Epstein. Will Trump Be Next?

"Hillary Clinton's testimony was, unsurprisingly, pointless. The committee's subpoena to the former secretary of State was an unserious bit of political showboating by chairman James Comer and other Republicans bent on creating sizzle with a boldface name and settling decades-old grudges. Clinton told the committee in advance she had never even met Epstein and knew nothing about his misdeeds."

"Bill Clinton is a different story. His testimony was downright Clintonian (defined by the Urban Dictionary as a statement that 'typically skirts the issue or spins words'). The former president began by congratulating himself for coming forward out of a sense of patriotic duty and a deep moral obligation to protect Epstein's victims."

"This week, with its subpoena of Attorney General Pam Bondi and its agreement with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick for his testimony, the committee displayed its willingness to demand answers even from those sitting on high perches. Those moves, coupled with the recent testimony from the former First Couple, tee up an even higher-stakes showdown ahead: Will Donald Trump be next?"

The House Oversight Committee conducted depositions with Bill and Hillary Clinton regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Hillary's testimony proved unproductive, as she claimed no knowledge of Epstein or his activities. Bill's testimony employed evasive language and deflection tactics. The committee subsequently subpoenaed Attorney General Pam Bondi and secured testimony from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, demonstrating determination to obtain answers from high-ranking officials. These actions suggest the committee may pursue testimony from Donald Trump. Hillary notably criticized Representative Lauren Boebert for leaking a deposition room photo, violating procedural rules. The overall proceedings appeared partly motivated by political considerations alongside legitimate investigative objectives.

Read at Intelligencer