"I think the reason a lot of real people watch the State of the Union is they want to know what it's going to mean to them, right? You get done with dinner, you put your kids to bed, and then you tune in to see if your president can tell you how he's going to make your life better, especially because this president has made your life worse, right?"
"A year ago, he was promising that costs were going to go down. He has directly driven them up. And it would have been nice to hear some indication of what he was going to do differently this time in order to have different results. But obviously, that's not what happened."
"I think a lot of people around America, if they were hoping to get some indication of how their everyday lives were going to be better, then they're going to be disappointed because at most, they heard the same empty promises that we're used to from this president."
A political commentator reflects on watching the State of the Union address, noting that ordinary Americans tune in hoping to learn how their lives will improve. The president previously promised to reduce costs but has instead driven them up. The address offered no indication of different approaches or results, disappointing those seeking concrete plans for economic relief. Instead of substantive policy proposals, viewers heard familiar empty promises. The commentator suggests that AI summarization tools might be more useful than watching the lengthy speech itself, highlighting the lack of meaningful content delivered.
Read at Queerty
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]