"I mean, it's very alienating and it's very unconservative, and it's not going to serve anybody well: not the right, not them. It's a pointless exercise because most conservatives will recoil when faced with the choice of say it, say it my way rather than getting on board. That is just not for us. That's just not how we've operated."
"This is just pathetic horseshit. It's a cynical effort to stay on Tucker's good side (or his audience's) by pretending it's unconservative (even neoconish and BLM-ish, wink wink) to have a problem with playing footsie with neo-Nazis. Real conservatives (because judging such things is where Megyn's true authority and expertise lies) make peace with bigots and anti-Semites. This is just pathetic horseshit. It's a cynical effort to stay on Tucker's good side (or his audience's) by pretending it's unconservative (even neoconish and BLM-ish, wink wink) to have a problem with playing footsie with neo-Nazis. Real conservatives (because judging such"
"Oh good grief. There is no say it faction criticizing Tucker. It's about moral principles and literal freaking Nazis."
A conservative pundit compared a faction of the right — described as neocon and pro‑Israel — to Black Lives Matter while criticizing criticism of Tucker Carlson for giving Nick Fuentes a platform. The comparison prompted sharp pushback from fellow commentators who called the comparison cynical and accused the pundit of seeking favor with Carlson's audience. Critics argued the dispute centers on moral responsibility and the mainstreaming of extremist figures rather than intra‑party tactics. Other reactions accused the pundit of aligning with Fuentes and warned that accommodating bigots would fracture conservative credibility and alienate mainstream supporters.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]