"As the Project Athena plan clearly demonstrates, Isaacman has a good handle on the problems besetting NASA, an aging and increasingly bureaucratic agency. NASA can still do great things, but it has become almost infinitely harder since the heady days of Apollo six decades ago. Isaacman has ideas to shake things up, but not to the extent of wanton change for the sake of change."
"It is clear from the interviews he has given to others, and in talking to him myself, that Isaacman is also a good listener. He wants to understand problems to he can work with others to apply thoughtful solutions. Perhaps most importantly for NASA, unlike some other Trump administration nominees, he appears to be a builder, not a leveler. Isaacman is coming into a beleaguered and bruised agency that has faced an extraordinarily difficult year."
Project Athena outlines Isaacman's approach to address systemic problems at NASA, emphasizing measured reforms rather than disruptive overhaul. Isaacman combines problem understanding with listening skills to collaborate on thoughtful solutions. He positions himself as a builder, focused on construction and progress rather than dismantling institutions. The agency recently suffered about 20 percent of its 17,500 employees taking buyouts or early retirements, layoffs at JPL, and concerns about Goddard's future. NASA faces a high-stakes race with China to return humans to the Moon and a political budget tension between a proposed 24 percent cut and congressional resistance. Isaacman's withdrawn nomination caused delays.
Read at Ars Technica
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]