Judges express regret over the imposition of indefinite jail terms under the IPP system. These sentences, imposed without foresight of their impact, have resulted in many inmates languishing in prison for minor offenses for decades. Notable cases include individuals who have suffered significant mental distress. Calls for government action to address the plight of over 2,500 prisoners currently affected have been made, with judges emphasizing the need for reform to alleviate the injustices inherent in these sentences introduced in 2005. Apologies have been suggested as recognition of the unfairness of the situation.
Sir John Saunders said he would apologise to offenders he handed imprisonment for public protection (IPP) jail terms, which have become a source of injustice since their implementation. He expressed sorrow over the unfair circumstances faced by these inmates, emphasizing the need for recognition of the psychological toll it has taken on them. He regrets being part of a system that resulted in indefinite sentences, which have left many prisoners without a foreseeable release, often unable to access required rehabilitation programs.
The IPP sentences, introduced in 2005, were intended to make sure offenders completed rehabilitation courses before being released, but judges underestimated the resultant indefinite detention of prisoners without a clear path to rehabilitation.
Collection
[
|
...
]