"There is abundant evidence that the subpoenas' dominant (if not sole) purpose is to harass and pressure Powell either to yield to the President or to resign and make way for a Fed Chair who will. Judge James Boasberg stated the government has produced essentially zero evidence to suspect Chair Powell of a crime and called the subpoenas' justifications so thin and unsubstantiated that they were simply a pretext."
"The unprecedented investigation into Powell and the Fed is the latest in a series of moves by the Trump administration to pressure the central bank, which has for decades been considered as independent from day-to-day politics. Trump has also sought to fire Lisa Cook, a member of the Fed's governing board, after a member of his administration accused her of mortgage fraud, though no charges were ever filed."
Federal Judge James Boasberg invalidated Justice Department subpoenas issued to the Federal Reserve in January, determining the investigation into Chair Jerome Powell's testimony about a $2.5 billion building renovation lacked legitimate basis. The judge found the government produced essentially zero evidence of criminal activity and characterized the subpoena justifications as thin and unsubstantiated pretexts. Boasberg concluded the investigation's dominant purpose was harassment and pressure to force Powell to cut interest rates or resign, aligning with Trump's repeated demands. The ruling blocks U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro from obtaining Fed records related to the renovation. This investigation represents part of broader Trump administration efforts to pressure the independent Federal Reserve, including attempts to remove Fed board member Lisa Cook.
#federal-reserve-independence #trump-administration-pressure #judicial-oversight #powell-investigation #central-bank-politics
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]