"No questions beforehand, no prep, didn't pee, sat there for three hours, Rogan recalled about the Trump interview. He's almost 80. If he was wearing a diaper, respect, but the guy just hung out for three hours. Does that mean I agree with everything he does? F**k no. Of course not. But he was able to be himself for three hours. He was able to talk for three hours whereas Kamala wouldn't do it."
"You only have seven minutes before you have to cut to commercial, or whatever it is. You can't do that. It'll take me seven minutes to ask what she likes to cook I want to know is there anything she regrets doing, what has she learned from this time, is it more complicated being a vice president than you thought it was going to be?"
"She wouldn't do it, McCann responded. She could have done it. I'm telling you, man, it would have been fine, Rogan insisted. McCann added to his argument by saying he was left unimpressed with a Harris appearance on Stephen Colbert's late-night show. I watched her for six minutes on Stephen Colbert and I don't think she could do it, he said. Rogan argued shows like Colbert's are handicapped from the jump because of time limits, commercial breaks, and potential influence of an audience."
Joe Rogan and comedian James McCann debated whether Kamala Harris could have sat for a three-hour interview similar to Rogan's marathon with Donald Trump. Rogan recalled that Trump sat without prep for three hours and emphasized the ability to be oneself in an extended conversation. McCann argued Harris would not have lasted, citing a brief Stephen Colbert appearance as unimpressive. Rogan countered that late-night formats are constrained by time, commercials, and audience influence, and said he would ask personal questions about regrets, expectations versus reality in the vice presidency, and money in politics.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]