I research the harm of social media on teens. Here's why I don't support a ban

"From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.Your support makes all the difference."

"The UK government has launched a consultation on introducing an Australian-style ban on social media for under-16s. The proposal is framed as a bold response to rising concerns about young people's mental health, online abuse and exposure to harmful content. At first glance, a ban sounds straightforward: keep children away from platforms that can cause harm. But as someone who has spent years researching young people's digital lives, relationships and wellbeing, I believe that a blanket ban risks misunderstanding both the problem and the solution. My research with teenagers consistently shows that the harms young people experience online are not separate from the harms they face offline. Bullying, racism, sexism, coercion, exclusion and body image pressures all pre-date social media. Digital platforms can amplify these problems, but they do not create them from scratch. In focus groups I conducted with teenagers and research I carried out with young people during the pandemic, participants described online life as an extension of school corridors, peer groups and local communities."

The Independent emphasizes the need for on-the-ground journalism and funding to maintain accessible reporting without paywalls. The UK government is consulting on an Australian-style ban on social media for under-16s, presented as a response to youth mental health concerns, online abuse and harmful content. A blanket ban risks misunderstanding both the problem and the solution. Research shows that online harms are intertwined with offline harms such as bullying, racism, sexism, coercion, exclusion and body image pressures. Digital platforms amplify existing problems rather than creating them. Young people describe online life as an extension of school corridors, peer groups and local communities.

Read at www.independent.co.uk