"They took her answer out and they gave her a totally different answer using her. At least they used her, but they took it from 20 minutes or something later in the interview. In other words, they took some other answer to a totally different question. And it was still a lousy answer. But it wasn't election threatening, right? And we just settled that case. But that's not as bad as what BBC did."
"BBC, actually, I mean, as bad as that was, they took her and her answer was terrible. It was long, horrible, stupid, so stupid. If anybody listening to it would have voted for Trump. Most of them did anyway, fortunately. But what happened is they threw it out, just threw it out, and they took another one. They asked a question. They put a totally different answer."
President Donald Trump said he has an obligation to sue the BBC for at least $1 billion, calling a doctored BBC clip that made it appear he called for violence before the Jan. 6 Capitol riot worse than 60 Minutes' editing of a Kamala Harris interview. He compared BBC's alleged editing to a 60 Minutes alteration of Harris’s answers and described BBC’s conduct as election-threatening. He said the BBC used a different answer taken later in an interview and credited a competitor for exposing the alteration. He contrasted uncovering the 60 Minutes edit via a commercial with finding the BBC edit through an external report.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]