"Klein writes that Democrats began the shutdown with an unusually strong case and a rare moral frame. The stated purpose was to resist President Donald Trump's authoritarian behavior, not simply to secure a year-long extension of Affordable Care Act tax credits. But as the standoff dragged on and internal pressure mounted, the party narrowed its goals to a technocratic concession that Klein says fails to match the stakes."
"In early October, he urged Democrats to treat the moment as a necessary and even unavoidable confrontation, warning that we are in a government shutdown in all but name and arguing the party had no choice but to make ACA tax credits and, by extension, the broader fight over Trump's authoritarian impulses the line in the sand. He emphasized that the expiring subsidies would trigger a huge premium shock and cost millions their coverage,"
Democrats began the shutdown with an unusually strong case and rare moral frame. The stated purpose was to resist President Donald Trump's authoritarian behavior rather than to secure a year-long extension of Affordable Care Act tax credits. As the standoff dragged on and internal pressure mounted, the party narrowed its goals to a technocratic concession that fails to match the stakes. Early strategic urging framed expiring ACA subsidies as a trigger for large premium shocks and loss of coverage for millions, casting the fight as a moral stand. The shift toward a health-insurance technicality created a mismatch between moral ambition and bargaining position despite polling indicating voters blamed Republicans.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]