Editorial: Removal of Sheriff Corpus rife with secrecy, lacks due process
Briefly

San Mateo County supervisors’ effort to remove Sheriff Christina Corpus has sparked controversy over transparency and due process. Voters passed Measure A, allowing supervisors to oust the sheriff, which set off a series of procedures perceived as biased and unfair. Critics argue that the supervisors are overstepping by serving as prosecutor and judge, while substantial evidence about Corpus' alleged misconduct remains concealed from the public. An investigation led by retired Judge Cordell raised serious concerns but is criticized for relying on hearsay and anonymous sources. The lack of transparency in the process has led to heightened scrutiny and distrust from the community.
Under the procedures devised by the San Mateo County supervisors, they act as prosecutor, judge, jury, and court of appeal, undermining fairness and due process.
The process initiated on June 5 reflects a comprehensive investigation by an outside law firm, yet the county has not released this crucial documentation.
Read at The Mercury News
[
|
]