"I state this in the vaguest of terms for two reasons: First, there's still no good constitutional rationale for an executive order to override laws that states pass for themselves, let alone on artificial intelligence, and the version of the executive order that leaked from the White House in November immediately presented an overwhelming amount of legal issues (to say nothing about the David Sacks of it all)."
"Unfortunately, this presidency is run on tyrannical vibes and Diet Coke, so one can safely assume that while whatever emerges from the White House won't pass legal scrutiny, Trump sure as hell will push his people to do whatever he wants them to, to do it quickly, and to not question his judgment about it. (Imagine, if you will, that "states' rights" is "the East Wing of the White House," and "control over America's AI policy" is "a ballroom.")"
President Donald Trump has committed to signing an executive order intended to assert federal control over AI regulation. The proposed order lacks a clear constitutional rationale for overriding state laws and a leaked November draft raised significant legal concerns. The public announcement was vague and made on Truth Social, offering little detail about objectives. The administration is likely to pressure staff to implement directives rapidly and without scrutiny. The dynamic is framed as centralizing control, likened to moving "states' rights" into the White House, with potential political fallout extending beyond immediate Washington institutions.
Read at The Verge
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]