At Harvard, a clash between democracy and monarchy

"Yarvin's argument that American democracy has exhausted itself and needs to be replaced by one-man rule has made him a star on the right."

"The debate was a clash between monarchism and liberal democracy, showcasing the tensions between Yarvin's views and those of his opponent, Danielle Allen."

Curtis Yarvin, a far-right writer and neo-monarchist, debated Danielle Allen, a Harvard political theorist, at an event organized by Passage Publishing and the John Adams Society. Yarvin's controversial views on dismantling American democracy in favor of a more autocratic system have gained him notoriety and attention from influential figures on the right. The debate epitomized a clash between his far-right ideologies and Allen's advocacy for liberal democracy, highlighting the growing tensions within American political discourse.

Read at Boston.com