The article argues that President Trump must prioritize an aggressive stance against Iran's nuclear ambitions, ensuring that any negotiations lead to a firm, enforceable deal. It criticizes the previous JCPOA under Obama, claiming it allowed Iran to maintain their nuclear program inadequately. The piece states that Trump's previous 'maximum pressure' tactics successfully curbed Iranian aggression and that a new deal must include strict limitations on nuclear development and sanctions that can swiftly be reinstated if Iran noncomplies. Failure to achieve this would signify a flawed agreement.
Trump must ensure that any deal with Iran effectively guarantees that they will never develop nuclear weapons, moving beyond mere historical agreements like the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
The Iranian regime under Trump faced major economic sanctions and international pressure, which curtailed their aggression significantly compared to the more lenient approach adopted under Biden.
Former President Obamaâs approach to Iran is criticized for being too lenient, allowing Tehran to advance its nuclear ambitions while fostering a more aggressive foreign policy under the current administration.
A successful agreement should not only halt Iran's nuclear program but also diminish its military capabilities and incorporate a mechanism for reinstating sanctions if Tehran violates terms.
Collection
[
|
...
]