"We've seen it again and again: when the suspect is Muslim, Black, immigrant, or left-wing, the outrage machine roars within minutes. Headlines scream terrorism, pundits demand crackdowns, and politicians sprint to microphones with sweeping solutions. When the suspect, on the other hand, is a white man in MAGA merch, the temperature mysteriously drops. The vocabulary softens. The story shifts toward lone wolves, snapped minds, "seemed like a nice guy." Somehow the political movement he publicly embraced is treated as irrelevant."
"Photos circulating from prior years show Sanford in a Trump 2020 camo shirt and Trump signage at his home. I am here to point out a pattern: when atrocity is linked to Trump-world aesthetics, conservative leaders and media tend to minimize, de-politicize, or change the subject. We get platitudes about "ending the epidemic of violence," but not the full-body condemnation they reserve for suspects they consider the other side."
Independent reporting depends on reader support and membership to remain ad-free and independent. Public reaction to violent incidents varies by the suspect's identity, with swift outrage when suspects are Muslim, Black, immigrant, or left-wing, and muted responses when suspects are white and Trump-aligned. Coverage often frames non-white suspects as political threats while describing white suspects as isolated or psychologically troubled. The disparity shapes public perception, policy priorities, and which communities are preemptively treated as threats. Documented examples include a truck-and-shooting attack linked to a white veteran seen wearing Trump-branded apparel and signage.
Read at Thenorthstar
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]