"To be clearthe Guthrie family to include all siblings and spouses has been cleared as possible suspects in this case. The family has been nothing but cooperative and gracious and are victims in this case, began Nanos. To suggest otherwise is not only wrong, it is cruel. The Guthrie family are victims plain and simpleplease, I'm begging you the media to honor your profession and report with some sense of compassion and professionalism."
"I can tell you that my source every day since has stood by that reporting. And that is the thinking as of the day after Mrs. Guthrie was reported missing, asserted Banfield during their sit-down. So your source still indicating that he is a suspect? followed up Abrams. Nothing's changed. Nothing's changed. But I will say this: the day after I did that report, my source said, things have really tightened up.' The folks in the Sheriff's Department are worried about retaliation because of the leak. And I thought to myself, Well, if it's not true, there wouldn't be any worry,' you know? And then on the third day he said, What I can tell you is: when they take shots at you, you're standing on the target,' replied Banfield."
Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos publicly cleared all members of Nancy Guthrie's family, including siblings and spouses, as possible suspects and described them as cooperative, gracious victims. Nanos called suggestions of family involvement wrong and cruel and implored the media to report with compassion and professionalism. Journalist Ashleigh Banfield promoted the idea that son-in-law Tommaso Cioni could be a suspect and said a source continued to stand by that claim. Banfield said law enforcement feared retaliation after the leak and reiterated her source’s assertions during an interview with Dan Abrams despite departmental pushback.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]