Women allegedly abused by Andrew Tate decry misleading' Spectator article
Briefly

Women allegedly abused by Andrew Tate decry misleading' Spectator article
"They still face a number of criminal charges, their homes have been repeatedly raided and they've spent time in jail, but they deny all wrongdoing and have not yet been found guilty of anything. The big Romanian case against them appears to have stalled, after a judge ruled that the evidence wasn't strong enough to go to trial, and the brothers have launched a suit in America against a woman they claim conspired to defame them through a fraudulent conspiracy."
"We are disgusted by this Spectator interview with Andrew Tate and his brother. These are men who UK authorities have authorised 21 charges against for alleged crimes including rape, actual bodily harm and human trafficking. How can the Spectator think it's appropriate to interview these men but fail to ask them one question about the allegations against them?"
Four alleged survivors of sexual abuse by Andrew Tate and his brother complained to the press regulator about the Spectator's portrayal of the men. The women have filed a high court claim accusing Tate of rape, coercive control, assault and battery. The women described themselves as disgusted and said the Spectator failed to ask the brothers about the allegations. The brothers deny the civil and criminal claims. UK authorities have authorised 21 charges including rape, actual bodily harm and human trafficking. A Romanian judge ruled the major case lacked sufficient evidence to go to trial, and the brothers have launched a US defamation suit.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]