The Guardian view on Starmer's Mandelson gamble: his political judgment faces scrutiny in pivotal week | Editorial

"Sir Philip Barton's evidence could be crucial, especially if he names those who applied pressure regarding Lord Mandelson's appointment, potentially putting Sir Keir Starmer in a difficult position."

"Morgan McSweeney's testimony will be pivotal, as it may either confirm or deny the pressure applied for Mandelson's approval, influencing the narrative surrounding the appointment."

"Cat Little's statement that there were no records explaining Sir Olly Robbins' decision to clear Lord Mandelson raises significant questions about the vetting process and accountability."

The foreign affairs select committee will examine Sir Keir Starmer's appointment of Peter Mandelson as US ambassador. Sir Philip Barton, a key witness, had reservations about the appointment. Starmer's assertion of no pressure is challenged by evidence suggesting otherwise. Morgan McSweeney's testimony may reveal inconsistencies. Sir Olly Robbins and Cat Little provided evidence on the vetting process, with Little noting a lack of records regarding Robbins' decision. The inquiry could impact public perception of Starmer's integrity and the government's handling of the appointment.

Read at www.theguardian.com