"News that Prime Minister Keir Starmer ignored warnings of senior advisers and appointed Jeffrey Epstein's pal Peter Mandelson as Britain's ambassador to the U.S. was bad for the embattled leader. It seems unlikely to improve. Starmer continues to weather the fallout from Mandelson's appointment and later sacking but the nearly 150 pages of documents released by his government Wednesday were just a small fraction of the thousands of pages still to come."
"It's hard to believe that later releases are going to persuade anybody to see the PM's decision in a better light, said Tim Bale, politics professor at Queen Mary University of London. It's damning stuff and, if the country weren't preoccupied with rather more important Middle Eastern matters at the moment, it might even have hastened Starmer's departure."
"Documents confirmed what was already known: Starmer chose the savvy veteran politician despite a reputation tainted by previous scandals and ties to Epstein. The due diligence checklist released from Mandelson's vetting highlighted in bold le"
Prime Minister Keir Starmer faced substantial criticism for appointing Peter Mandelson as Britain's ambassador to the United States, ignoring warnings from senior government advisers. Documents released by the government revealed that Mandelson's vetting process highlighted his reputation tainted by previous scandals and connections to Jeffrey Epstein. Political analysts suggest the appointment reflects poorly on Starmer's judgment and decision-making. Nearly 150 pages of released documents represent only a fraction of thousands more expected to be disclosed, with experts predicting additional releases are unlikely to improve public perception of the prime minister's controversial choice.
Read at www.independent.co.uk
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]