"Several honourable and right honourable members had written to him, he began. Including the leader of the opposition. So far, so normal. MPs are always writing to the speaker about something they are unhappy about."
"The matter in hand was the prime minister's answers to the house in relation to the appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the US. MPs felt they had been misled."
"Such debates should be granted only very sparingly, he said. As gatekeeper it was his job to make sure that anything frivolous would not be taken forward."
"At this point, it seemed like a no-brainer that Hoyle would deny the application for the debate. Because almost nothing could be more frivolous than this."
Lindsay Hoyle addressed concerns from MPs, including Keir Starmer, regarding the prime minister's responses about Peter Mandelson's appointment as ambassador. MPs believed they were misled, prompting Kemi Badenoch to request a debate to refer Starmer to the privileges committee. Hoyle emphasized that such debates should be rare and frivolous matters would not be entertained. Despite expectations that the request would be denied, the situation has created an unexpected challenge for Starmer, highlighting tensions in parliamentary communication and accountability.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]