
"From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground."
"Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.Your support makes all the difference."
"Independent readers have reacted to Sir Keir Starmer's sacking of Peter Mandelson following revelations about his links to convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Readers have also weighed in on Starmer's clarity of judgement over his appointment of Mandelson to the role of US ambassador in the first place. They described Mandelson as a long-time opportunist, accusing him of moral and political bankruptcy. Several also argued that the scandal has exposed broader failings in the Prime Minister's vetting process and raises questions about the government's standards."
The Independent funds on-the-ground reporting across issues such as reproductive rights, climate change, and Big Tech and emphasizes parsing facts from messaging. Donations support sending journalists to speak to both sides of developing stories and enable free access by avoiding paywalls, with the belief that quality journalism should be paid for by those who can afford it. Readers reacted strongly to Sir Keir Starmer's sacking of Peter Mandelson after revelations of links to Jeffrey Epstein, describing Mandelson as opportunistic and morally compromised, praising swift action, and criticizing vetting and potential reputational risks to the Labour Party.
Read at www.independent.co.uk
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]