If Labour didn't exist, would you invent it? Streeting, Rayner, Burnham you need to tell us why

A political standoff is framed like a poker game, with resignations and claims about whether key figures hold enough support to trigger a formal contest. Cabinet resignation is presented as a frustrated attempt to break a stalemate, while the ability to force a reshuffle remains unclear. The focus shifts to why a Labour party is needed in 2026, including whether it should exist at all and what voices, problems, opportunities, or injustices would be missed without it. The voting landscape is described as split by financial security and social attitudes, with Labour and Conservatives favored by the financially secure and Greens or Reform favored by those struggling. The question is raised about what Labour can uniquely do compared with smaller leftwing parties.

"Since the outcome is unclear at the time of writing, for now let's leave aside the issue of whether Starmer even has the authority to do a reshuffle and focus on one question: why does Britain need a Labour party in 2026? If it didn't exist, would you invent it? Who would lack a voice, what problems could not be resolved, what opportunities would be missed or injustices perpetrated if it didn't exist? Should it still hanker after representing the huddled masses, or settle for the people who actually seem to vote for it now, which is mostly the liberal middle classes?"

"His resignation from cabinet, in a blistering statement that noticeably failed to confirm he had the numbers to trigger a formal contest, was a frustrated last attempt to break the stalemate by taking what he called personalities including possibly his own and petty factionalism out of a revolt against Keir Starmer in which both are surgically embedded."

"But in the end Streeting simply kicked the table over, scattering poker chips in all directions. His resignation from cabinet, in a blistering statement that noticeably failed to confirm he had the numbers to trigger a formal contest, was a frustrated last attempt to break the stalemate by taking what he called personalities including possibly his own and petty factionalism out of a revolt against Keir Starmer in which both are surgically embedded."

"In practice, the financially secure are most likely to vote either Labour or the Tories while the struggling go Green or Reform, depending on whether they're socially liberal or conservative. And what can Labour uniquely do that all the smaller leftwing parties can't? The answer to the last used to be"

Read at www.theguardian.com