"Norris defended the confiscation of valuables from refugees, telling Sky News: At the moment, the British public pay billions of pounds a year so that those seeking asylum, or those who have already failed in their applications, can be supported in their accommodation and their living. It is right if those people have money in the bank, people have assets like cars, like e-bikes, they should be contributing."
"Asked if jewellery without sentimental value could be taken, Norris said people should wait for Mahmood to set out the plans to the House of Commons on Monday afternoon. Pressed on whether the likes of wedding rings could be included, Norris said: In the instance you're talking about, no, of course not. If someone comes over with a bag full of gold rings, well, that's different to what I said about the heirloom."
Jewellery without sentimental value could be taken from asylum seekers to help pay the costs of processing cases, while wedding rings would generally be excluded. The proposal incorporates elements of Denmark's tougher asylum approach promoted by home secretary Shabana Mahmood and aims to reduce refugee arrivals. The measures are intended to shift contributions for accommodation and living costs toward asylum seekers who possess assets. The proposals have provoked concern among Labour MPs, with at least one minister reportedly on resignation watch. The government also indicated that countries refusing to take back nationals could face diplomatic consequences.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]