A week off from PMQs can't save Starmer from awkward questions over welfare bill | John Crace
Briefly

Keir Starmer's absence from PMQs during a Nato summit allowed opposition leader Angela Rayner to address a growing revolt among Labour MPs regarding the government's welfare policy. This timing spared Starmer embarrassment from the rebellion and highlighted the internal struggles within the Labour ranks. Meanwhile, Kemi Badenoch faced challenges, needing a deputy to represent the Tories, reflecting potential weaknesses in her leadership. The performance of the deputies during this politically delicate moment showcased the dynamic nature of PMQs and the influence of leadership presence or absence within the political arena.
Starmer's absence allowed the opposition to sidestep embarrassment over internal rebellions, showcasing how the dynamics at PMQs can shift the political landscape.
Angela Rayner stepped in effectively, adapting to the circumstances and taking the opportunity to critique the government amid a chaos-ridden Tory party.
Badenoch's deputy's often do better than her, signaling a potential weakness in her leadership capabilities and raising questions about her role at PMQs.
Mel Stride's performance at the dispatch box highlights the complexities of political strategy, relying on insider knowledge despite his known shortcomings.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
|
]